Пожалуйста, используйте этот идентификатор, чтобы цитировать или ссылаться на этот ресурс:
http://dspace.nuph.edu.ua/handle/123456789/32645
Полная запись метаданных
Поле DC | Значение | Язык |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kravchenko, V. M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Nodar Sulashvili | - |
dc.contributor.author | Benzid Yassine | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-24T11:05:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-24T11:05:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Kravchenko, V. M. Biochemical methods of smoking status verification in tobacco research / V. M. Kravchenko, Nodar Sulashvili, Benzid Yassine // Сучасні досягнення експериментальної, клінічної, екологічної біохімії та молекулярної біології : зб. публ. I Міжнар. наук.-практ. online конф., присвяченої 85-річчю з дня заснування кафедри біохімії, м. Харків, 7 берез. 2024 р. – Харків : НФаУ, 2024. – С. 317-323. | uk_UA |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.nuph.edu.ua/handle/123456789/32645 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Increasing digital delivery of smoking cessation interventions has resulted in the need to employ novel strategies for remote biochemical verification. This scoping review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate best practices for remote biochemical verification of smoking status. The scientific literature was searched for studies that reported remotely obtained (not in-person) biochemical confirmation of smoking status (ie, combustible tobacco). A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to investigate key outcomes, which included rates of returned biological samples and the ratio of biochemically verified to self-reported abstinence rates. A total of 82 studies were included. The most common samples were expired air (46%) and saliva (40% of studies), the most common biomarkers were carbon monoxide (48%) and cotinine (44%), and the most common verification methods were video confirmation (37%) and mail-in samples for lab analysis (26%). Mean sample return rates determined by random-effects meta-analysis were 70% for smoking cessation intervention studies without contingency management (CM), 77% for CM studies, and 65% for other studies. Among smoking cessation intervention studies without CM, self-reported abstinence rates were 21%, biochemically verified abstinence rates were 10%, and 47% of individuals who self-reported abstinence were also biochemically confirmed as abstinent. This scoping review suggests that improvements in sample return rates in remote biochemical verification studies of smoking status are needed. Recommendations for reporting standards are provided that may enhance confidence in the validity of reported abstinence rates in remote studies. | uk_UA |
dc.language.iso | en | uk_UA |
dc.subject | biochemical verification methods | uk_UA |
dc.subject | smoking status | uk_UA |
dc.subject | tobacco | uk_UA |
dc.subject | carbon monoxide | uk_UA |
dc.title | Biochemical methods of smoking status verification in tobacco research | uk_UA |
dc.type | Article | uk_UA |
Располагается в коллекциях: | Тези доповідей співробітників НФаУ |
Файлы этого ресурса:
Файл | Описание | Размер | Формат | |
---|---|---|---|---|
317-323.pdf | 1,49 MB | Adobe PDF | Просмотреть/Открыть |
Все ресурсы в архиве электронных ресурсов защищены авторским правом, все права сохранены.